# Return to Sport After Injury: Complete Guide

Returning to sport after an injury is much more than simply resuming activity. It's a structured process that requires methodical progression, objective criteria, and tailored professional support.

Between 12% and 63% of athletes experience a recurrence within a year of returning, often because they resumed too quickly or without respecting the return-to-play criteria¹. Here's the good news: comprehensive rehabilitation and well-supervised progression significantly reduce these risks².

As physiotherapists specializing in sports rehabilitation at Physioactif, we support hundreds of athletes each year in their return to sport. Our approach is based on scientifically validated criteria and individualized progression tailored to the type of injury, the sport practiced, and each person's goals.

Why specialized rehabilitation for returning to sport?

Returning to sport requires physical abilities that far exceed those needed for daily activities. Walking without pain does not mean you are ready to run, jump, or change direction quickly.

Sports place significant forces on joints. A single jump can generate forces on the knee equivalent to 3 to 6 times your body weight³. Athletic movements require fine coordination, quick reaction times, and precise motor control. After a sports injury, these abilities are impaired, even if muscle strength seems to have returned⁴.

Returning to activity too soon increases the risk of re-injury by 2 to 6 times⁵. For anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, the re-injury rate reaches 20-30% among athletes who resume activity before 9 months⁶.

A physiotherapist specializing in sports rehabilitation evaluates and treats deficits specific to your sport. Our role involves objectively assessing your musculoskeletal condition, correcting any deficits in strength and mobility, training for specific athletic movements, providing physical and mental preparation, and preventing re-injuries through a personalized program.

What are the validated return-to-play criteria?

Return-to-play criteria are objective markers that indicate a person is ready to resume their sport without excessive risk.

Essential Physical Criteria

The injured joint must regain its normal range of motion, comparable to the healthy side. Even a slight deficit can alter biomechanics and increase stress on other structures⁷.

The injured limb must achieve at least 90% of the strength of the opposite, uninjured side. For high-risk sports (soccer, basketball), some experts recommend 95% or more⁸. Isokinetic tests help evaluate strength at different speeds. A persistent imbalance indicates an increased risk of injury⁹.

Specific functional tests evaluate your ability to perform sports movements. Tests such as the single leg hop for distance, triple hop, and crossover hop measure power, multi-directional control, and lateral stability. The standard criterion is to achieve at least 90% of the performance of the healthy side¹⁰.

Video motion analysis helps identify compensatory movements. For example, a knee that collapses inward during landing (dynamic valgus) increases the risk of ACL injury¹¹. Residual pain during sport-specific movements indicates incomplete recovery¹².

Psychological and Timelines Criteria

Kinesiophobia (fear of movement) affects up to 50% of athletes after a serious injury¹³. The ACL-RSI (ACL Return to Sport after Injury) is a validated questionnaire that evaluates confidence in the injured area, emotions related to returning to sport, and the athlete's own risk assessment. A score below 56/100 predicts an increased risk of abandoning the sport¹⁴.

Some structures require specific, unavoidable timelines to heal. For example, an ACL ligament needs 9 to 12 months post-surgery for the graft to mature¹⁵. An Achilles tendon requires 6 to 9 months for tendon remodeling¹⁶. Grade 2 muscle tears typically need 4 to 8 weeks¹⁷. Resuming activity before these timelines dramatically increases the risk of re-injury.

What are the progression phases for returning to sport?

Returning to sport follows a progression through five distinct stages. Each phase prepares you for the next with specific goals.

Phase 1: Early Rehabilitation (0-6 weeks)

This phase aims to control inflammation and pain, restore range of motion, prevent muscle atrophy, and maintain cardiovascular fitness. Typical activities include gentle joint mobilizations, pain-free isometric therapeutic exercises, adapted cardiovascular work (stationary bike, swimming), and basic motor control.

The criteria for moving to the next phase include achieving at least 80% of the healthy side's range of motion, the ability to walk without limping, voluntary muscle control, and pain levels below 3/10 during daily activities.

Phase 2: Intermediate Rehabilitation (6-12 weeks)

The goals of this phase are to normalize muscle strength and endurance, improve balance and proprioception, begin multi-directional movements, and progress to closed-chain exercises. This phase is characterized by progressive strengthening (squats, lunges, step-ups), balance exercises on unstable surfaces, low-intensity plyometrics, and intensified cardiovascular work.

To progress, you must achieve at least 70% of the healthy side's strength, pass basic functional tests (e.g., single leg stance for 30 seconds), be able to jog lightly without pain, and demonstrate increasing confidence in the injured area.

Phase 3: Advanced Rehabilitation (12-20 weeks)

This phase aims to achieve strength and power comparable to the healthy side, master changes of direction, pass validated functional tests, and simulate sport-specific movements. High-load strengthening, progressive plyometrics (jumps, bounds), sprints and decelerations, and sport-specific exercises become central during this phase.

Criteria for progression include achieving at least 90% of the healthy side's strength, performing hop tests at 90% or more, absence of pain during intense activities, and an ACL-RSI score of at least 56/100, if applicable.

Phase 4: Return to Training (20-24 weeks)

This phase is characterized by gradual integration into team training, adapting to the sport's volume and intensity, and maintaining rehabilitation gains. Partial participation in training (50-75%), weekly volume progression following the 10% rule, maintaining the prevention program, and symptom monitoring are essential.

Returning to competition requires full participation in all training sessions, no residual pain or swelling, performance equivalent to pre-injury levels, and approval from the medical team.

Phase 5: Return to Competition and Prevention

This final phase aims to safely resume competition, maintain physical abilities, continue long-term prevention, and monitor for signs of recurrence. Gradual progression of competitive load, a long-term prevention program (Nordic hamstring, stability exercises), and monitoring training loads (acute:chronic ratio below 1.5)¹⁸ are crucial.

How to objectively assess readiness to return to sport?

Objective assessment combines several types of tests to create a complete picture of the athlete's condition.

Isokinetic tests measure strength at a constant speed, allowing comparison of the injured limb to the healthy limb (Limb Symmetry Index) and also between agonist and antagonist muscles. A quadriceps/hamstring ratio below 0.6 increases the risk of hamstring injury¹⁹.

A battery of four hop tests is recommended for knee injuries²⁰: single leg hop for distance, triple hop for distance, crossover hop for distance, and 6-meter timed hop. A Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) of at least 90% is required for each test.

The Y-Balance Test measures the maximum reach distance in 3 directions (anterior, posteromedial, posterolateral) while standing on one leg. An asymmetry greater than 4 cm increases the risk of injury by 2.5 times²¹. The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) assesses dynamic stability in 8 directions, and is particularly useful for ankle sprains²².

Clinical observation of movement patterns identifies compensations such as dynamic knee valgus/varus, contralateral pelvic tilt, or propulsion asymmetry. High-speed video analysis allows for detailed evaluation using free software (Kinovea, Dartfish).

How to psychologically prepare for returning to sport?

Mental preparation is as important as physical preparation. Many athletes abandon their sport not due to physical limitations, but due to fear or lack of confidence²³.

After a painful injury, the brain develops an association between movement and danger. This kinesiophobia can persist even after complete healing²⁴. Signs include avoiding certain movements, excessive muscle tension, body hypervigilance, and catastrophizing normal sensations.

Gradual exposure follows a hierarchy similar to physical progression: mental visualization of simple movements, performing non-threatening movements, progressing to complex movements, simulating game situations, and a gradual return to competition. Each step builds confidence before moving to the next²⁵.

Visualization activates the same brain regions as actually performing the movement²⁶. It can strengthen motor patterns, reduce anxiety, improve confidence, and accelerate motor recovery. Practice 10 to 15 minutes daily by visualizing successful sports movements.

Identifying and modifying negative thoughts also helps. Replacing "I'm going to get injured again" with "My body is ready, the tests confirm it" restructures cognition. SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) create a sense of progress and maintain motivation.

A sports psychologist can assess mental readiness, treat kinesiophobia with cognitive-behavioral approaches, teach stress management techniques, and provide support during the return to competition. Psychological intervention significantly improves return-to-sport rates and performance²⁷.

How to prevent recurrences after returning to sport?

Recurrence prevention begins as soon as training resumes and continues long-term.

Strength gains are quickly lost without maintenance. A program of 2 to 3 sessions per week prevents this loss²⁸. For the knee, key exercises include Nordic hamstring curls, squats, and valgus control. For the ankle, proprioceptive exercises and peroneal strengthening are essential. For the shoulder, rotator cuff strengthening and scapular stabilization are paramount.

The 10% rule recommends increasing training load by a maximum of 10% per week²⁹. The acute:chronic ratio (weekly load divided by the average of the last 4 weeks) should remain between 0.8 and 1.3. Above 1.5, the risk of injury increases by 2 to 4 times³⁰.

Validated programs significantly reduce injuries. The FIFA 11+ reduces soccer injuries by 30 to 50%³¹. Nordic hamstring exercises decrease hamstring tears by 51%³². Neuromuscular training reduces ACL injuries by 52%³³. Proprioceptive exercises for the ankle decrease sprains by 36%³⁴.

Monitoring for warning signs of overload is crucial: persistent pain, unusual fatigue, decreased performance, sleep disturbances, irritability, and loss of motivation. If these signs are detected, reduce the load by 30 to 50% until recovery.

Maintaining contact with your physiotherapist after returning to sport allows for program adjustments based on your response, early detection of problems, and building confidence. Periodic re-evaluations (at 3, 6, and 12 months) identify emerging deficits before they cause injuries.

How long does it take to return to sport?

The duration varies greatly depending on the type and severity of the injury, as well as the demands of the sport. A grade 1 ankle sprain typically allows a return to training in 1 to 2 weeks and to competition in 2 to 4 weeks³⁵. A grade 2 sprain requires 2 to 4 weeks for training and 4 to 6 weeks for competition.

Grade 1 muscle tears require 1 to 3 weeks before returning to training and 2 to 4 weeks before competition³⁶. Grade 2 tears need 3 to 8 weeks for training and 6 to 12 weeks for competition, respectively, with a high risk of recurrence.

Achilles tendinopathy requires 8 to 16 weeks for training and 12 to 24 weeks for competition, with an eccentric loading program³⁷. Patellofemoral pain syndrome needs 6 to 12 weeks for training and 8 to 16 weeks for competition, along with quadriceps strengthening.

A post-operative ACL rupture requires 6 to 9 months before returning to training and 9 to 12 months before competition, respecting the minimum timeframe³⁸. A first-time shoulder dislocation needs 3 to 6 weeks for training and 6 to 12 weeks for competition, with a high risk of recurrence. A concussion requires 1 to 4 weeks for training and 2 to 6 weeks for competition, following a gradual Return-to-Play (RTP) protocol³⁹.

These timeframes are approximate. Individual progress depends on objective criteria, not just the time that has passed. Factors such as age (slower recovery after 40), injury history, sleep and nutrition quality, initial injury severity, activity level, and available resources all influence the duration.

Consult a specialized physiotherapist if you are unsure about being ready to return, if you experience pain or instability, if you fear re-injury, if your injury affects a high-risk sport, if you have previously suffered a recurrence, or if you want a personalized prevention program.

What does research say about returning to sport?

A 2016 systematic review reports that 81% of athletes return to sports activity, 65% return to their pre-injury level, and 55% return to competition⁴⁰. For ACL ruptures, only 44 to 63% resume competitive play⁴¹.

Physical factors predicting success include quadriceps strength greater than 90% of the uninjured side, hop test scores greater than 90%, absence of residual pain, and adequate neuromuscular control⁴². Psychological factors include an ACL-RSI score greater than 56, low kinesiophobia, high social support, and high perceived self-efficacy⁴³. Models combining both physical AND psychological criteria predict return to sport better than each type alone⁴⁴.

After an ACL rupture, contralateral recurrence reaches 15 to 20% within 2 years, and ipsilateral recurrence is 5 to 10%⁴⁵. The risk is highest if return occurs before 9 months (6 times higher)⁴⁶. After an ankle sprain, 40 to 70% develop chronic instability, and 30 to 40% experience a recurrence within a year⁴⁷. Proprioceptive prevention reduces this risk by 36%⁴⁸. For hamstring tears, the recurrence rate ranges from 12 to 31%, with the highest risk in the first 2 weeks of return⁴⁹. The Nordic program reduces recurrences by 51%⁵⁰.

Evidence-based recommendations for returning to sport include respecting the biological healing time for the specific injury, lower limb strength of at least 90% LSI, hop test scores of 90% or more LSI (minimum 4 tests), adequate neuromuscular control (movement analysis), an ACL-RSI score of at least 56 for major injuries, and full participation in training without symptoms⁵¹.

Risk reduction strategies include preventive neuromuscular programs (2 to 3 times per week), load monitoring (acute:chronic ratio below 1.3), optimal recovery (sleep, nutrition), and correction of individual risk factors⁵².

Frequently Asked Questions about Returning to Sport After Injury

Mild pain (1 to 2 out of 10) during high-intensity movements may be acceptable if it doesn't worsen and quickly disappears after activity. However, any persistent pain that increases during activity or affects your technique should be evaluated before returning. Pain can lead to compensations that increase the risk of secondary injuries.

Current recommendations suggest waiting a minimum of 9 months, ideally 12 months, after surgery. This timeframe allows the graft to mature and regain sufficient mechanical properties. However, time alone is not enough. You must also meet objective criteria (strength, hop tests, neuromuscular control, psychological readiness). Approximately 30% of athletes are not ready even at 12 months.

No, hop tests are an important element but are not sufficient on their own. A safe return requires a comprehensive evaluation including muscle strength, range of motion, neuromuscular control (movement analysis), psychological readiness, full participation in training, and validation by the medical team. Hop tests primarily assess power and confidence, but not fine motor control.

It depends on the injury. For moderate to severe ankle sprains, taping or a semi-rigid brace for 6 to 12 months reduces the risk of recurrence. For post-ACL knees, braces have not shown a clear benefit in preventing recurrences, although some athletes report increased confidence. For unstable shoulders, taping can help temporarily. Discuss with your physiotherapist to determine if a brace is appropriate.

Fear of re-injury is very common and affects up to 50% of athletes. It is addressed with gradual progression to build confidence, progressive exposure exercises to feared movements, mental imagery to visualize successful movements, restructuring catastrophic thoughts, and, sometimes, the help of a sports psychologist. Do not minimize this fear. It deserves to be addressed as much as the physical aspects.

Absolutely, and it is even highly recommended. Prevention programs like FIFA 11+ reduce injuries by 30 to 50% in uninjured athletes. A preventive assessment with a physiotherapist can identify risk factors (imbalances, mobility deficits, technique issues) before they cause problems. Primary prevention is much more effective than treating injuries once they have occurred.

This situation requires communication between your healthcare professionals. The doctor often assesses tissue healing (imaging, clinical examination), while the physiotherapist evaluates function (strength, movement, sports capabilities). Both perspectives are important. Ideally, request a joint meeting or ask your professionals to discuss together. A safe return requires both tissue healing AND restored function.

This varies greatly depending on the injury. A mild ankle sprain might require 4 to 6 sessions, a moderate muscle tear 8 to 12 sessions, and an ACL reconstruction 30 to 50 sessions over 9 to 12 months. The frequency generally decreases over time (2 to 3 times per week initially, then once a week, then every two weeks). Your physiotherapist will establish a personalized treatment plan during your initial assessment.

Potentially yes, especially if your technique contributed to the initial injury. Video analysis can reveal issues such as knee valgus, overpronation, excessive forward trunk lean, or excessive heel strike. These patterns increase stress on certain structures. Your physiotherapist can analyze your technique and suggest progressive corrections. Technical changes take time (a minimum of 6 to 8 weeks) and require conscious repetition.

Often yes, but it depends on the injury and the sport involved. Modified cardiovascular activities (cycling, swimming, elliptical) are generally encouraged from the early stages. Sports involving pivoting and impact (soccer, basketball) must wait until physical criteria are met. Your physiotherapist can guide you toward activities compatible with your healing stage. Maintaining cardiovascular fitness greatly facilitates the final return to sport.

Return to your sport with confidence

Returning to sport after an injury is both a physical and mental challenge. Our physiotherapists specializing in sports rehabilitation will support you through every stage, from the first days post-injury until your competitive return.

We offer a comprehensive assessment with validated functional tests and movement analysis, a personalized program tailored to your injury and goals, structured progression based on objective criteria, re-injury prevention programs, support to manage fear and rebuild confidence, and communication with your medical and sports team.

Our clinics are equipped with force platforms, video analysis systems, and sports equipment to simulate the real demands of your sport. Don't let an injury end your athletic journey. Book an appointment with one of our specialized physiotherapists for a complete assessment and a tailored return-to-sport plan.

References

1. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(21):1543-1552.

1. Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(13):804-808.

1. Leppänen M, Pasanen K, Kujala UM, et al. Stiff Landings Are Associated With Increased ACL Injury Risk in Young Female Basketball and Floorball Players. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(2):386-393.

1. Gokeler A, Welling W, Zaffagnini S, Seil R, Padua D. Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(1):192-199.

1. Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H, et al. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(13):804-808.

1. Kyritsis P, Bahr R, Landreau P, Miladi R, Witvrouw E. Likelihood of ACL graft rupture: not meeting six clinical discharge criteria before return to sport is associated with a four times greater risk of rupture. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(15):946-951.

1. Logerstedt DS, Snyder-Mackler L, Ritter RC, Axe MJ, Godges JJ. Knee stability and movement coordination impairments: knee ligament sprain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(4):A1-A37.

1. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(12):1697-1705.

1. Croisier JL, Ganteaume S, Binet J, Genty M, Ferret JM. Strength imbalances and prevention of hamstring injury in professional soccer players: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(8):1469-1475.

1. Gustavsson A, Neeter C, Thomeé P, et al. A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(8):778-788.

1. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(4):492-501.

1. Thomeé R, Kaplan Y, Kvist J, et al. Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(11):1798-1805.

1. Kvist J, Ek A, Sporrstedt K, Good L. Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13(5):393-397.

1. Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C. Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport. 2008;9(1):9-15.

1. Grindem H, Arundale AJ, Ardern CL. Alarming underutilisation of rehabilitation in athletes with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: four ways to change the game. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(18):1162-1163.

1. Silbernagel KG, Thomeé R, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J. Continued sports activity, using a pain-monitoring model, during rehabilitation in patients with Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(6):897-906.

1. Järvinen TA, Järvinen TL, Kääriäinen M, et al. Muscle injuries: optimising recovery. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21(2):317-331.

1. Gabbett TJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):273-280.

1. Croisier JL, Ganteaume S, Binet J, et al. Strength imbalances and prevention of hamstring injury in professional soccer players: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(8):1469-1475.

1. Reid A, Birmingham TB, Stratford PW, et al. Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther. 2007;87(3):337-349.

1. Plisky PJ, Rauh MJ, Kaminski TW, Underwood FB. Star Excursion Balance Test as a predictor of lower extremity injury in high school basketball players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(12):911-919.

1. Docherty CL, Valovich McLeod TC, Shultz SJ. Postural control deficits in participants with functional ankle instability as measured by the balance error scoring system. Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16(3):203-208.

1. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Webster KE. Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7):1549-1558.

1. Kvist J, Ek A, Sporrstedt K, Good L. Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13(5):393-397.

1. Podlog L, Eklund RC. A longitudinal investigation of competitive athletes' return to sport following serious injury. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2006;18(1):44-68.

1. Guillot A, Collet C, Nguyen VA, et al. Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(7):2157-2172.

1. Arvinen-Barrow M, Massey WV, Hemmings B. Role of sport medicine professionals in addressing psychosocial aspects of sport-injury rehabilitation: professional athletes' views. J Athl Train. 2014;49(6):764-772.

1. Mujika I, Padilla S. Detraining: loss of training-induced physiological and performance adaptations. Part I: short term insufficient training stimulus. Sports Med. 2000;30(2):79-87.

1. Johnston R, Cahalan R, O'Keeffe M, et al. Training load and baseline characteristics associated with new injury/pain within an endurance sporting population: A prospective study. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018;13(4):722-730.

1. Hulin BT, Gabbett TJ, Lawson DW, Caputi P, Sampson JA. The acute:chronic workload ratio predicts injury: high chronic workload may decrease injury risk in elite rugby league players. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(4):231-236.

1. Thorborg K, Krommes KK, Esteve E, et al. Effect of specific exercise-based football injury prevention programmes on the overall injury rate in football: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the FIFA 11 and 11+ programmes. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(7):562-571.

1. van der Horst N, Smits DW, Petersen J, et al. The preventive effect of the nordic hamstring exercise on hamstring injuries in amateur soccer players: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(6):1316-1323.

1. Sugimoto D, Myer GD, Foss KD, Hewett TE. Specific exercise effects of preventive neuromuscular training intervention on anterior cruciate ligament injury risk reduction in young females: meta-analysis and subgroup analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(5):282-289.

1. Hupperets MD, Verhagen EA, van Mechelen W. Effect of unsupervised home based proprioceptive training on recurrences of ankle sprain: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;339:b2684.

1. Kemler E, van de Port I, Backx F, van Dijk CN. A systematic review on the treatment of acute ankle sprain: brace versus other functional treatment types. Sports Med. 2011;41(3):185-197.

1. Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ, Tol JL, et al. Therapeutic interventions for acute hamstring injuries: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(2):103-109.

1. Alfredson H, Pietilä T, Jonsson P, Lorentzon R. Heavy-load eccentric calf muscle training for the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinosis. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(3):360-366.

1. Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H, et al. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(13):804-808.

1. McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Dvorak J, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(11):838-847.

1. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(21):1543-1552.

1. Lai CCH, Ardern CL, Feller JA, Webster KE. Eighty-three per cent of elite athletes return to preinjury sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review with meta-analysis of return to sport rates. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(2):128-138.

1. Toole AR, Ithurburn MP, Rauh MJ, et al. Young Athletes Cleared for Sports Participation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: How Many Actually Meet Recommended Return-to-Sport Criterion Cutoffs? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(11):825-833.

1. Langford JL, Webster KE, Feller JA. A prospective longitudinal study to assess psychological changes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(5):377-381.

1. Burgi CR, Peters S, Ardern CL, et al. Which criteria are used to clear patients to return to sport after primary ACL reconstruction? A scoping review. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(18):1154-1161.

1. Salmon L, Russell V, Musgrove T, Pinczewski L, Refshauge K. Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(8):948-957.

1. Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H, et al. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(13):804-808.

1. Anandacoomarasamy A, Barnsley L. Long term outcomes of inversion ankle injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(3):e14.

1. Hupperets MD, Verhagen EA, van Mechelen W. Effect of unsupervised home based proprioceptive training on recurrences of ankle sprain: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;339:b2684.

1. Opar DA, Williams MD, Shield AJ. Hamstring strain injuries: factors that lead to injury and re-injury. Sports Med. 2012;42(3):209-226.

1. van der Horst N, Smits DW, Petersen J, et al. The preventive effect of the nordic hamstring exercise on hamstring injuries in amateur soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(6):1316-1323.

1. Burgi CR, Peters S, Ardern CL, et al. Which criteria are used to clear patients to return to sport after primary ACL reconstruction? A scoping review. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(18):1154-1161.

1. Soligard T, Schwellnus M, Alonso JM, et al. How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(17):1030-1041.